I guess that I should have been a lawyer, because the lawyers are the only ones who will make money off of this lawsuit.
I'm sorry, but the lawyers for AA obviously have never tried to run a PPC campaign, or they would understand things like, "broad match" will return ads for everybody that has, "airlines" set up as a "broad" match.
I suppose that it would be pointless to sue every idiot that mistakenly entered, "airlines" as a broad match keyword in Google (or MSN or Yahoo, etc.) but it is equally as pointless to sue Google.
After all, how is Google supposed to know that American Airlines does not want any other ads to show up? If somebody is searching for "american airlines" does that mean that they are not supposed to return AA as the number 1 SERP? Or, is it only if the Capitalized version (
American
Airlines) is searched for? And, is the singular, "American Airline" supposed to abide by the same rules? What about, "american airline" as a search term?
The list of possible infractions becomes endless and unenforceable. And, there is nothing to prevent a newcomer to Adwords from mistakenly adding an offending keyword in broad match that would display an ad...
All I can say is, "Good luck, AA, with this lawsuit" and, I hope the judge has enough common sense to throw this one out...
Labels: Google, WTF